tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1948420587779787298.post888408226816885117..comments2023-06-16T05:25:55.741-07:00Comments on Elliptica: A SequenceLynethttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06357023675142716573noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1948420587779787298.post-48148583867412453512007-10-09T18:01:00.000-07:002007-10-09T18:01:00.000-07:00I've been missing your voice on Seedlings (though ...I've been missing your voice on Seedlings (though I'm sure it hasn't been that long, but the blogworld makes time seem compressed and sometimes decompressed!). Anyway, I see you've been playing with numbers, so you have a great excuse. Somebody's got to do this, and it generally isn't me. (Even so, I must say I'm enjoying teaching math to my home-educated daughters. But. Well. It's third and fifth-grade math!)L.L. Barkathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13333960142447144678noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1948420587779787298.post-22683479789079765422007-10-07T00:27:00.000-07:002007-10-07T00:27:00.000-07:00Ah! I hadn't. And yes, that paper basically give...Ah! I hadn't. And yes, that paper basically gives exactly our method of proof. Very nice. Thank you.<BR/><BR/>I <I>don't</I> know any Haskell, but the other paper is still interesting on a skim...Lynethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06357023675142716573noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1948420587779787298.post-42696071125209274602007-10-06T12:11:00.000-07:002007-10-06T12:11:00.000-07:00Have you seen this paper? Because if you haven't...Have you seen <A HREF="http://www.lacim.uqam.ca/~plouffe/OEIS/citations/recounting.pdf" REL="nofollow">this paper</A>? Because if you haven't, you should. =) <BR/><BR/>And also maybe <A HREF="http://web.comlab.ox.ac.uk/oucl/work/jeremy.gibbons/publications/rationals.pdf" REL="nofollow">this one</A>, although if you don't know any Haskell that one might be hard to follow, I'm not sure.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com